Photo by NOAA on Unsplash
The Federal Reserve has concluded its Quantitative Tightening (QT) program, a development often overlooked but indicative of a significant shift in monetary policy. This cessation is not a final endpoint, but rather a catalyst for a new phase, historically correlated with increased asset valuations. The decision to halt QT was driven by tightening reserve conditions and emerging stresses within the financial system’s infrastructure, prompting anticipatory signals from the Federal Reserve regarding potential asset repurchases to maintain systemic stability. As New York Fed President John Williams articulated, the decision to conclude QT was predicated on “clear market-based signals that reserves had moved down from abundant toward what [he] called somewhat above ample.”
This pattern has been observed in prior cycles (2012, 2016, 2019) – the conclusion of QT, subsequent liquidity constraints, and subsequent Federal Reserve intervention have consistently preceded periods of asset appreciation. Recent upward pressure in the repo market, evidenced by rates briefly exceeding the Federal Funds rate target and increased utilization of the Standing Repo Facility, underscored the dwindling availability of reserves and necessitated the Fed’s intervention on December 1st. As Dallas Fed President Lori Logan stated, “If repo rates keep rising, the Fed would need to start buying assets again to prevent reserves from falling too far.”
Reviewing the 2019 experience, the S&P 500 registered a gain of approximately 19% following the termination of QT and the subsequent increase in liquidity. Furthermore, Bitcoin exhibited even more pronounced gains during this period, demonstrating the potential for outsized returns in alternative assets during periods of expansive monetary policy. Specifically, from the 2019 lows, Bitcoin experienced substantial appreciation, followed by further gains after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
While Federal Reserve officials emphasize that these actions are not intended as “stimulus,” the economic impact remains comparable: an increase in the money supply. As Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell noted, “Once QT ended there would come a point where the Fed would have to expand its holdings again because reserves needed to grow with the size of the banking system.” Market analysts anticipate that the Federal Reserve may need to inject $20-88 billion per month beginning in 2026 to sustain the functioning of the financial system, given persistent government deficits. This is not a policy aimed at economic stimulus, but rather a necessary measure to ensure the operational integrity of the financial infrastructure. As Lyn Alden succinctly puts it:
“Nothing stops the train.”
However, a notable risk warrants consideration: escalating domestic political instability. The increasing frequency of inter-agency disputes, judicial interventions, and conflicts between state and federal authorities create an environment susceptible to unforeseen disruptions. As Ray Dalio recently cautioned, the substantial government deficits will likely result in the monetization of debt, “whether the Fed admits it or not.” This factor could potentially alter the anticipated trajectory of asset markets.
TL;DR: The Federal Reserve’s cessation of Quantitative Tightening signals a potential shift towards liquidity expansion, historically associated with improved asset performance (stocks, gold, and particularly Bitcoin). Investors should prepare for potential volatility, prioritize the allocation to scarce assets, and remain vigilant regarding domestic political developments which could introduce unforeseen systemic risks.
Key Considerations:
QT Conclusion: The Federal Reserve is no longer reducing its balance sheet.
Liquidity Dynamics: Increased liquidity generally supports asset valuations.
Historical Precedent: Prior instances of policy shifts have correlated with positive market returns, including substantial gains in both traditional and alternative asset classes.
Potential Risks: Domestic political instability represents a non-negligible risk factor.
Federal Reserve Communication: Careful attention should be paid to Federal Reserve messaging regarding reserve levels and potential asset purchases. As John Williams noted, these actions are not necessarily a shift in overarching policy, but represent crucial adjustments to maintain financial stability.
DISCLAIMER
This publication is general in nature and is not intended to constitute any professional advice or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any financial or investment products. You should seek separate professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters dealt with in this publication. Please also note our disclosure here
